Isn't Just Suffering
© 2000 Thanissaro Bhikkhu
For free distribution only.
You may print copies of this work for your personal use.
You may re-format and redistribute this work for use on
computers and computer networks,
provided that you charge no fees for its distribution
Otherwise, all rights reserved.
me the brightness of the world."
how my teacher, Ajaan Fuang, once characterized his debt to
his teacher, Ajaan Lee. His words took me by surprise.
I had only recently come to study with him, still fresh from
a school where I had learned that serious Buddhists took a
negative, pessimistic view of the world. Yet here was a man
who had given his life to the practice of the Buddha's teachings,
speaking of the world's brightness. Of course, by "brightness"
he wasn't referring to the joys of the arts, food, travel,
sports, family life, or any of the other sections of the Sunday
newspaper. He was talking about a deeper happiness that comes
from within. As I came to know him, I gained a sense of how
deeply happy he was. He may have been skeptical about a lot
of human pretenses, but I would never describe him as negative
or pessimistic. "Realistic" would be closer to the truth.
Yet for a long time I couldn't shake the sense of paradox
I felt over how the pessimism of the Buddhist texts could
find embodiment in such a solidly happy person.
when I began to look directly at the early texts did I realize
that what I thought was a paradox was actually an irony --
the irony of how Buddhism, which gives such a positive view
of a human being's potential for finding true happiness, could
be branded in the West as negative and pessimistic.
probably heard the rumor that "Life is suffering" is Buddhism's
first principle, the Buddha's first noble truth. It's a rumor
with good credentials, spread by well-respected academics
and Dharma teachers alike, but a rumor nonetheless. The truth
about the noble truths is far more interesting. The Buddha
taught four truths -- not one -- about life: There is suffering,
there is a cause for suffering, there is an end of suffering,
and there is a path of practice that puts an end to suffering.
These truths, taken as a whole, are far from pessimistic.
They're a practical, problem-solving approach -- the way a
doctor approaches an illness, or a mechanic a faulty engine.
You identify a problem and look for its cause. You then put
an end to the problem by eliminating the cause.
special about the Buddha's approach is that the problem he
attacks is the whole of human suffering, and the solution
he offers is something human beings can do for themselves.
Just as a doctor with a surefire cure for measles isn't afraid
of measles, the Buddha isn't afraid of any aspect of human
suffering. And, having experienced a happiness totally unconditional,
he's not afraid to point out the suffering and stress inherent
in places where most of us would rather not see it -- in the
conditioned pleasures we cling to. He teaches us not to deny
that suffering and stress or to run away from it, but to stand
still and face up to it, to examine it carefully. That way
-- by understanding it -- we can ferret out its cause and
put an end to it. Totally. How confident can you get?
number of writers have pointed out the basic confidence inherent
in the four noble truths, and yet the rumor of Buddhism's
pessimism persists. I wonder why. One possible explanation
is that, in coming to Buddhism, we sub-consciously expect
it to address issues that have a long history in our own culture.
By starting out with suffering as his first truth, the Buddha
seems to be offering his position on a question with a long
history in the West: is the world basically good or bad?
to Genesis, this was the first question that occurred to God
after he had finished his creation: had he done a good job?
He then looked at the world and saw that it was good. Ever
since then, people in the West have sided with or against
God on his answer, but in doing so they have affirmed that
the question was worth asking to begin with. When Theravada
-- the only form of Buddhism to take on Christianity when
Europe colonized Asia -- was looking for ways to head off
what it saw as the missionary menace, Buddhists who had received
their education from the missionaries assumed that the question
was valid and pressed the first noble truth into service as
a refutation of the Christian God: look at how miserable life
is, they said, and it's hard to accept God's verdict on his
debating strategy may have scored a few points at the time,
and it's easy to find Buddhist apologists who -- still living
in the colonial past -- keep trying to score the same points.
The real issue, though, is whether the Buddha intended his
first noble truth to answer God's question in the first place
and -- more importantly -- whether we're getting the most
out of the first noble truth if we see it in that light.
hard to imagine what you could accomplish by saying that life
is suffering. You'd have to spend your time arguing with people
who see more than just suffering in life. The Buddha himself
says as much in one of his discourses. A brahman named Long-nails
(Dighanakha) comes to him and announces that he doesn't approve
of anything. This would have been a perfect time for the Buddha,
if he had wanted, to chime in with the truth that life is
suffering. Instead, he attacks the whole notion of taking
a stand on whether life is worthy of approval. There are three
possible answers to this question, he says: (1) nothing is
worthy of approval, (2) everything is, and (3) some things
are and some things aren't. If you take any of these three
positions, you end up arguing with the people who take either
of the other two positions. And where does that get you?
then teaches Long-nails to look at his body and feelings as
instances of the first noble truth: they're stressful, inconstant,
and don't deserve to be clung to as self. Long-nails follows
the Buddha's instructions and, in letting go of his attachment
to body and feelings, gains his first glimpse of the Deathless,
of what it's like to be totally free from suffering.
of this story is that trying to answer God's question, passing
judgment on the world, is a waste of time. And it offers a
better use for the first noble truth: looking at things, not
in terms of "world" or "life," but simply identifying suffering
so that you can comprehend it, let it go, and attain release.
Rather than asking us to make a blanket judgment -- which,
in effect, would be asking us to be blind partisans -- the
first noble truth asks us to look and see precisely where
the problem of suffering lies.
discourses show that the problem isn't with body and feelings
in and of themselves. They themselves aren't suffering. The
suffering lies in clinging to them. In his definition of the
first noble truth, the Buddha summarizes all types of suffering
under the phrase, "the five aggregates of clinging": clinging
to physical form (including the body), feelings, perceptions,
thought constructs, and consciousness. However, when the five
aggregates are free from clinging, he tells us, they lead
to long-term benefit and happiness.
first noble truth, simply put, is that clinging is
suffering. It's because of clinging that physical pain becomes
mental pain. It's because of clinging that aging, illness,
and death cause mental distress. The paradox here is that,
in clinging to things, we don't trap them or get them under
our control. Instead, we trap ourselves. When we realize our
captivity, we naturally search for a way out. And this is
where it's so important that the first noble truth not
say that "Life is suffering." If life were suffering, where
would we look for an end to suffering? We'd be left with nothing
but death and annihilation. But when the actual truth is that
clinging is suffering, we simply have to look for the clinging
and eliminate its causes.
process takes time, though, because we can't simply tell the
mind not to cling. It's like a disobedient child: if you force
it to let go while you're looking, it'll search for a blind
spot where you can't see it, and will start to cling there.
In fact, the mind's major blind spot -- ignorance -- is the
prime cause that gives rise to clinging's proximate cause:
craving. So, as the fourth noble truth, the Buddha recommends
a path of practice to get rid of the blind spot. The path
has eight factors: right view, right resolve, right speech,
right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness,
and right concentration. In a more abbreviated form, the Buddha's
term for the practice is "abandoning and developing": abandoning
activities that hinder awareness, and developing qualities
that expand its clarity and range.
-- in which you refrain from unskillful thoughts, words, and
deeds inspired by craving -- is obviously an antidote to clinging.
The developing, though, plays a more paradoxical role,
for you have to hold to the skillful qualities of mindfulness,
concentration, and discernment that foster awareness until
they're fully mature. Only then can you let them go. It's
like climbing a ladder to get on a roof: you grab hold of
a higher rung so that you can let go of a lower rung, and
then grab onto a rung still higher. As the rungs get further
off the ground, your view gets more expansive and you can
see precisely where the mind's clingings are. You get a sharper
sense of which parts of experience belong to which noble truth
and what should be done with them: the parts that are suffering
should be comprehended; the parts that cause suffering should
be abandoned; the parts that form the path to the end of suffering
should be further developed; and the parts that belong to
the end of suffering should be verified. This helps you get
higher and higher on the ladder until you find yourself securely
on the roof. That's when you can finally let go of the ladder
and be totally free.
So the real question we face is not God's question, passing
judgment on how skillfully he created life or the world. It's
our question: how skillfully are we handling the raw
stuff of life? Are we clinging in ways that serve only to
continue the round of suffering, or are we learning to hold
to the ladder-like qualities that will eliminate craving and
ignorance so that we can grow up and not have to cling. If
we negotiate life armed with all four noble truths, realizing
that life contains both suffering and an end to suffering,
there's hope: hope that we'll be able to sort out which parts
of life belong to which truth; hope that someday, in this
life, we'll discover the brightness at the point where we
can agree with the Buddha, "Oh. Yes. This is the end of suffering